Welcome to Cayman Net News Online                                   Search: web our site
Free classifieds




 




Government chose port bid for $3m more


Hon McKeeva Bush,
Chairman of the Port Authority

Friday, May  6, 2005

The process of tendering over Government projects is coming under fire once again. This time, two local construction firms say their joint bid for the Port development was almost $3 million lower than the one actually awarded to Misener Marine to develop the new George Town port.

A joint-venture bid for the new port project was made by local contractors McAlpine and Arch & Godfrey but a spokesperson for the two firms said that once they submitted their bid they heard nothing more until the award to Misener was announced.

“Even though the bid we submitted was close to $3 million dollars less than the one awarded, our bid was overlooked and we can see no sensible reason why, and are entirely puzzled by the tendering process on this occasion.”

The spokesperson told Cayman Net News that no explanation had ever been given for the refusal of their bid and that it was clear, once again, that Caymanians were not getting value for money as yet another contract went to an overseas firm.

“Nor is this the first time,” recalled the spokesperson. “We were also all ready to make a bid regarding the Turtle Farm development only to find that no tendering process seemed to take place at all.”

Criticism has been levelled by various local firms over recent contracts ranging from the Affordable Housing Initiative (AHI) to MC Restoration.

An Auditor General’s report criticised the tendering process in respect of the AHI contract and, although the report on MC Restoration has not yet been officially placed in the public domain, it has been suggested that the Auditor General again criticised the tendering process, among other things in respect of that contract.

In the case of the Misener contract, Cayman Net News reported in March that on 29 April 2003, Hon McKeeva Bush, in his various capacities of Leader of Government Business, Chairman of the Port Authority Board and Minister of Tourism, wrote a letter to John L Bolles, Vice President of Misener Marine Construction, Inc. of Tampa, Florida.

The letter in question stated that Hon McKeeva Bush, on behalf of the Port Authority of the Cayman Islands, thereby gave Misener Marine an exclusive right to design, build and finance a cruise ship berthing facility in George Town.

However, it is understood that Misener Marine subsequently received a demand from the Port Authority personnel to supply a copy of this letter to the Director because the Authority had not previously been aware of its contents, even though it purports to bind the Authority.

The copy of the letter as supplied by Misener Marine to the Port Authority appears to indicate on the header line that the original letter from Hon McKeeva Bush was faxed to Misener from the offices of Quarry Products Ltd in Grand Cayman and not, as one would expect, from either the Cayman Islands Government or the Port Authority.

Cayman Net News submitted a list of questions concerning the letter in question to John Bolles at Misener, without response even some two months later.

In particular this newspaper also asked Mr Bolles if he was able to explain why such a letter would have been faxed to Misener in the first instance from Quarry Products Ltd and not from the offices of the Government or the Port Authority, and whether, at the time of receipt of the letter, if he made any enquiries as to why it was not faxed to Misener from an official source.

Mr Bolles was also queried about the involvement of Quarry Products in the contract in question and if he was aware at the time that neither the Director nor the Board of the Port Authority had any prior knowledge of the letter in question or of its contents.

Back...


Send us your comments!  

Send us your comments on this article for publication in our new Readers' Forum.  All fields are required but you may make submissions using your own name, a nickname or as "Anonymous".

For your contribution to reach us, you must (a) provide a valid e-mail address and (b) click on the validation link that will be sent to the e-mail address you provide.  If the address is not valid or you don't click on the validation link, it will be a waste of your time typing your submission because we will never see it!

Your Name:
Your Email:  (Validation required)
Topic:          
Comments: