
Promises not ‘broken’ says PPM
 |
 |
 |
| Kurt Tibbetts |
Alden McLaughlin |
McKeeva Bush |
Thursday, May 19, 2005
The decision by the newly elected People’s Progressive Movement (PPM)
Government to appoint their North Side Legislative Assembly representative
political veteran and stalwart, Edna Moyle, as Speaker of the House, has opened
the first floodgates of criticism from former United Democratic Party (UDP)
chief and newly re-elected member of the Legislative Assembly, McKeeva Bush.
Mr Bush had said that he was surprised the PPM had chosen one of its own for
the position when they had been outspoken about the need for a neutral Speaker.
The basis for Mr Bush’s criticism is a claim that the PPM had promised that
the appointee to such a post would not have party affiliations and that Ms
Moyle’s appointment seems to be in obvious contravention of such a promise.
In response to Mr Bush’s claim, the PPM’s General Secretary, Alden McLaughlin
and new Cabinet member said: “It is still very much the position of the PPM to
have the office of Speaker of the House be an autonomous one.
“However, it is highly inaccurate to say that this was a campaign promise.
This point is not mentioned in the PPM’s Manifesto.
“The position of the Speaker of the House was spoken through debate on the
constitution. From the standpoint of the separation of powers, we are still
dedicated to the autonomy of the post. However, until the constitutional issue
over the position is addressed, we consider this a transitional period and we
also consider Ms Edna Moyle’s appointment to be a temporary one,” added Mr
McLaughlin. He pointed out that a Speaker still needs to be in place before the
constitution is addressed, not least because of the numerous pressing issues
facing the new Government.
“However we needed to have someone in place as there is quite a lot of
business that needs to be addressed within the next couple of weeks and the
budget is one example,” said Mr McLaughlin.
“This has to be ready for the beginning of the fiscal year, July 1. Against
the background of the immediate need to have a Speaker appointed, the
appointment was made.
“The only other person with the relevant experience was Mr Linford Pierson.
However, Mr Pierson has dedicated the past six weeks to unsubstantiated
criticism of the PPM. Against this fact, the reality is that his clear position
towards the Government was not one that would foster an environment that would
instill confidence in the new government.”
Speaking to the same matter in his first official statement, PPM’s party
leader, Kurt Tibbetts said: “In a maturing democracy such as ours we believe
that it is important that the office of Speaker is separated from the Portfolio
of Internal and External Affairs and becomes autonomous as it is in most
democracies.”
Back...

|