Welcome to Cayman Net News Online                                   Search: web our site
Free classifieds




 




Brac Trust Chapter releases candidates’ responses to Green Questionnaire

Friday,  June  17, 2005

Following its mandate of protecting the natural and cultural heritage of the Caymans, the Brac Chapter of the National Trust developed a Green Questionnaire prior to the election.

Developed by the Trust’s Brac members, the questionnaire asked candidates for MLA their positions on a variety of issues reflecting concerns over the long-term cultural and ecological future of the Brac.

Brac Trust chair Martin Keeley said he is grateful to the five candidates who took the time to fill in the questionnaire.

“It shows that they felt the many of the issues facing the Brac outlined in the questionnaire were extremely important to the future of the Island,” he told Cayman Net News.

In the questionnaire, entitled “A Better Island” the candidates were asked to answer 1, 2, 3 or 4 on a series of questions relating to Cayman Brac’s environment, development, walking paths, quality of water, light, air and quietness, health and pests, nature and geography.

The Brac NT provided the following summary of the candidates’ general positions, which members believe will be of great interest to Cayman Brac residents.

Trends: “Should remain distinctly different from George Town/West Bay”:
Candidates were unanimous in preferring to keep Cayman Brac distinct from the pattern of development on the main Island.

A green island: Although methods and definitions may differ, a strong feeling is expressed by all responding candidates that the Brac must be kept “green”. One method supported would be a very large protected national park on Cayman Brac.

Zoning: Although zoning was talked out of consideration last time it was proposed, zoning is now back as a way to encourage orderly development. All candidates voted strongly towards zoning, except one who in fact did not vote against it.

Walking: All responding candidates would support an initiative to increase the number of safe footpaths on Cayman Brac.

Quality of water, quality of night skies: Reassuringly, all respondents support a high standard for groundwater, and are interested in keeping the clear quality of our night skies.

Regarding noise, all support peace and quiet too, and limits on the “right” to make excessive noise by vehicle exhaust and sound systems.

Pests: All would support immediate, science-based action to reduce the problem of rats and flies.

Geography: All are aware of the importance of our beach ridge and the need too for bluff protection. Further, all support the need to protect special areas, and to secure beach access for present and future generations.

Two candidates did not return the questionnaires. The National Trust, Cayman Brac District, wishes to thank the other five for sharing their views on these important matters. The candidates are:

Julianna O’Connor Connolly, Moses Kirkconnell, Maxine McCoy Moore, Cantrell Scott and Kelly Thompson.

Speaking on behalf of the Trust, Brac NT Secretary Claudette Upton said, “We were very encouraged that five of the seven candidates took the time to respond, even though they knew we weren’t going to publish their input before the election. This shows there is interest in these issues on the part of the people running for office.”

She added, “We were also encouraged to see that all the candidates that responded were concerned about the issue of preserving the Brac’s eco-system.”

A more detailed review of the Green Questionnaire will be included in the forthcoming newsletter of the Brac chapter.

Back...


Send us your comments!  

Send us your comments on this article for publication in our Readers' Forum. All fields are required and in the interest of openness and transparency we will no longer accept anonymous submissions. We therefore request that all submissions include a name for publication, regardless of content. We will in special circumstances protect a writer’s identity only after we have established good cause for anonymity, otherwise we will not be able to publish the submission.

For your contribution to reach us, you must (a) provide a valid e-mail address and (b) click on the validation link that will be sent to the e-mail address you provide.  If the address is not valid or you don't click on the validation link, it will be a waste of your time typing your submission because we will never see it!

Your Name:
Your Email:  (Validation required)
Topic:          
Comments: