
SPORTS COMMENTARY
Utilising former West Indies talent

by Philip Hackett
Tuesday, February 28, 2006
It is no secret that many Caribbean people prefer and
often place a higher value on things, ideas and people from outside our region.
Culturally we readily embrace North America. Those who claim to be more
‘conscious’, search elsewhere for their ‘roots’.
It is probably this ‘foreign is better mindset’ that
opened the door for the first non-West Indian cricket coach, despite the
wealth of talent we already possess. The fact that Bennett King has also
been given an Australian support staff, unquestionable power and support
systems his West Indian predecessors never enjoyed, support my view.
That the results have not been consistent with the
financial investment undertaken by the WICB is not fully the fault of King
as the board has been distracted by the fracas between itself and the WIPA.
The unavailability of players resulting from this has made it difficult for
King to make any meaningful headway as would have been the case had even
Houdini been in charge of the team.
These realities do not absolve King of his
responsibility, as those who held the position before him also worked under
less than satisfactory conditions and had much less support from the board.
King replaced Gus Logie just when it seemed the team
had been making some headway. We will never know if the success in the ICC
Champions Trophy would have been the catalyst for dramatic improvement, as
Logie was relieved of his duties and Lara, after his most successful
tournament at the helm, found himself out of favour because of the
sponsorship row.
In the midst of a turbulent year the Stanford project
emerged to offer hope. The foreign element was again present in the form of
the Texan businessman though he would probably be quick to point to his
close Caribbean business connections.
The 20/20 project has had its critics but there is no
denying the lessons that can be learned from Stanford primarily through his
use of human resources. His level of thinking and approach are surely not
consistent with anything we have seen in Caribbean sport, especially
cricket.
Some cricket purists prefer to focus on the format of
the competition, scheduled for Antigua in July, but they are neglecting the
positive aspects of Stanford’s involvement.
Stanford has found a way to utilise the knowledge and
experience of our former greats and reward them handsomely too. It is
something the WICB has struggled to do, much to the bewilderment of many,
including former Test stars like Curtly Ambrose.
Prior to the announcement of the Stanford 20/20,
Ambrose told me of his frustration at not being invited to lend assistance
in a coaching capacity.
“Administrative level, no! Coaching level, yes,” Ambrose responded
emphatically when quizzed about his willingness to be involved in regional
cricket.
“Since my retirement, or even before that, I always
said that when I finish with this game I would love to give back what I have
learned over the years to West Indies cricket, especially the fast bowlers.
I don’t think I was the worse. I think I have learned something over the
years and I am just waiting for the opportunity to help these guys. Up to
now I have not been asked so I am still waiting,” said the former fast
bowler who took 405 wickets in 98 Tests.
“I have said it many times, interviews in the papers,
on TV and the radio whatever, and any opportunity I get. Everywhere I go
people kept saying to me ‘you have to make a comeback you know or you have
to work with these guys or stuff like that’. I’ve always said that I would
love to help,” Ambrose said.
Unable to suggest a reason why he has not been asked
by the WICB officials, Ambrose quipped, “Maybe I wasn’t good enough, I don’t
know, it’s a tough question, but I am here to offer my services any given
day.”
The Stanford 20/20 has now given Ambrose and the other legends the chance to
make an impact on the development of cricket throughout the region.
Philip Hackett is a freelance sports
journalist and a cricket radio commentator.
Back...

|